Software Engineering & Technical Consulting
“AI made writing code faster. It did not remove the need for engineering judgement.”
Your codebase is growing but maintainability is declining. You need an independent senior perspective before problems reach production.
What I doI apply independent engineering judgement to your architecture, codebase and development practices — providing the senior review layer that gives founders, stakeholders and engineering teams greater confidence before shipping.
Business outcomes
Increased confidence before shipping
Reduced avoidable production risk
Clearer architecture and maintainability path
Engineering standards that scale with the team
Capabilities
Common questions
It starts with a review of your codebase, architecture and development practices, then a written assessment of what's risky, what's solid, and what to prioritise — followed by hands-on advisory or implementation, depending on what you need. It's not a one-off slide deck; findings turn into an actual worked backlog.
Both. Some engagements are an independent review of a codebase that already exists; others start at architecture decisions before a line of code is written. The judgement being sold is the same either way.
You get senior-level judgement without the hiring cycle, onboarding time, or long-term headcount commitment — scoped to the problem in front of you, and it can start immediately and scale down once the risk is addressed.
Anywhere from a solo founder with a growing codebase to an engineering team that wants an independent second opinion before a major decision — the case studies on this site range from a 225,000-line production SaaS platform to early-stage builds.
Have a project that fits this?
Tell me what you're working on and where you're stuck. I'll determine whether I can help.
Request a Technical Review